you were never given, you were built

on the luxury of 'finding your path,' 300 applications into the void, and why the kids who had to write their own first draft are the ones least surprised right now.

18 min read

I get asked a version of the same question a lot.

"How did you figure out what you wanted to do so early?"

It's a well-intentioned question. It usually comes from someone a little older, someone who spent a decade in a career they didn't love before figuring out what they actually wanted. They ask it like i was handed a map, read it, and walked directly to where i am now.

I wasn't. There was no map. There was no figuring out. There was only writing. Writing a first draft of a person, then ripping it up. Writing another one. Ripping that one up. Writing again at 2am in my parents' house with the door closed because nobody in my family could tell me what i was even trying to become.

The thing you read on my resume is not the path i discovered. It's the path i authored. Draft after draft. Most of them bad. A few of them redeemable. One of them, eventually, the story you're reading now.

I keep coming back to this because i think the entire culture of career advice in America is built on a lie. The lie is that somewhere out there, waiting for you, is a Path. A Real Self. A True Calling. And your job is to find it. Follow your passion. Discover your purpose. Trust the process.

That's a beautiful story.

It's also a story told almost exclusively by people who were handed one to begin with.


I wrote recently about the creation myth in startups. The idea that great companies spring fully formed from a brilliant founder's brain. That there's a eureka moment. That the best products are "created" rather than chiseled, evolved, iterated into existence over years.

It's bullshit. Notion ate five years in Kyoto on a $150k loan from the founder's mom. Clay sat at $0 revenue for five years. Gamma ate a 95% drop-off rate for two. These companies were not created. They were AUTHORED. Draft after draft, over years, in the claustrophobic middle that nobody talks about.

I want to make an argument in this post that i think is the mirror image of that one:

People are not created either.

The identity you think you "discovered" is the one you wrote. Draft by draft. Most of it in conditions the creation myth doesn't have room for: desperation, confusion, fear, furious 3am cold emails into voids, applications you sent knowing they wouldn't be read. The career you have didn't appear. You built it. You are its author.

And if that feels threatening, it's probably because the discovery narrative was doing some heavy lifting for you. Letting you off the hook. Letting the thing that's actually you remain on standby somewhere while you wait for it to reveal itself.

It's not coming. Nothing's coming. You're the one who has to write it.


OK so let me start with the numbers, because that's how i check my own thinking. If "you have to author yourself" is just a vibe, i'd rather know.

The receipts got spicy while i was researching this.

Nearly half of Fortune 500 companies (46.2% as of August 2025) were founded by immigrants or their children. That's the highest percentage ever recorded. 109 companies founded by immigrants directly. 122 by their children. The "New American" Fortune 500 generated $8.6 trillion in revenue in FY 2024. Which would make it, as a theoretical country, the third-largest economy on earth.

And it's not just the big companies. 44% of US-based unicorns (startups valued over $1B) are led by immigrant founders. India first (90 founders). Israel (52). Canada (42). If you added children of immigrants to that number, it gets comically lopsided.

Here's the part that always gets me: Immigrant families are a single-digit percentage of the US population. Immigrants themselves are about 14%. Children of immigrants push it to maybe 25% when you count first-and-second-gen combined.

A quarter of the population is producing nearly half of the most valuable companies in the country.

This is not a coincidence. And it is not because those families had better career advice, better connections, or better advisors.

It's because when you are the first in your family to figure out what a startup even is, you don't have the luxury of waiting to discover your path. You have to write one. Nobody else is going to do it for you. That constraint (which looks like a disadvantage from the outside) turns out to be the most underrated creative advantage in the modern economy.

Discovery is a luxury. Authorship is a constraint. And constraints make founders.


Let me show you what "finding your path" actually looks like when you've been handed one.

I grew up on the Eastside of Seattle. Redmond, Bellevue, Kirkland. Microsoft campus territory. You know the type of neighborhood. The driveways have Teslas, the kids have PSATs scheduled in 7th grade, and the default path for anyone smart is: GPA > AP > SAT > top-20 university > summer internship at Big Tech > full-time offer > Teams job at Microsoft > a startup in year 3 if you're feeling spicy.

Some of those kids were genuinely brilliant. Many still are. I'm not making fun of them. What i'm trying to name is the specific texture of their experience, which is:

They never had to write a first draft of themselves.

The draft was handed to them. By their parents, by their school system, by the aunties and uncles who worked at Microsoft and Amazon and Boeing. The path they were "discovering" had been pre-authored. They just had to fill in the blanks.

And good for them. I mean that. That stability is valuable. Pre-authored lives work. They produce perfectly fine careers. Most of those kids now have Teams jobs and nice houses and seem content, and i don't think there's anything wrong with that at all. I wrote about this. There's nothing wrong with the traditional path if your circumstances favor it.

But what i want to name, and i've never seen anyone say this plainly, is that "follow your passion" and "discover your calling" and "trust the process" are pieces of advice that only make sense if a process is already in place for you to trust.

If your family has a process, you can trust it. If your community has a process, you can trust that. If there's a version of who you're supposed to become that's already been drafted, sure, follow your passion. The structure is there to catch you if the passion doesn't lead anywhere.

But if there's no process? No draft? No structure?

You are not going to find your path. You are going to write it. And it's going to be embarrassing. And it's going to take years. And you're going to have seven versions of yourself that didn't work before you write the version that does.

Discovery is what you do when someone else has already built the thing. Authorship is what you do when there's nothing there yet.

I was authoring. They were filling in the blanks. Different activity. Different outputs. Usually not visible from the outside until a decade in.


My first draft, if i'm being honest, was terrible.

I was 16 and i wanted to be in tech but had no idea what that meant. My parents didn't know what computer science was. Not really. My dad is one of the smartest people i know and my mom is one of the hardest-working people i've ever met, but they came to this country from Iran and built a life from scratch and the gap between "our kid likes computers" and "here is how you get a job at a software company" was an ocean nobody in my family had ever crossed.

So i just… started moving. In every direction. All at once. With no map.

I joined clubs i wasn't sure i belonged in. I cold-emailed people who had no reason to respond. I built Course Finder at 17 because nobody helped me pick classes. 14,000 UW students used it. I built Aristotle / Ace the Interview the week GPT-3.5 dropped because nobody helped me practice interviews. 2,000 users the first week. None of these were strategic. They were just me grabbing a pen and writing anything down on the blank page in front of me because nobody else was going to.

And then i ran into the wall that every first-gen kid eventually hits.

I applied to over 300 jobs during one stretch. Zero callbacks.

Not "a few callbacks that didn't work out." Not "some leads that fizzled." Zero. Three hundred applications into a void. 3.9 GPA. Product with 14,000 users. Portfolio that any reasonable recruiter would've at least acknowledged.

And i remember sitting in my room at 2am thinking either the entire system is broken or i am profoundly, irredeemably bad. And since i was 19 and proud i preferred the first answer, but there was enough doubt in there that it started to genuinely break something in me.

Here's what the data says now, in 2026, about why that was happening:

Cold applications make up 93.8% of the total application pool, but only a small fraction of actual hires. And since 2021, the conversion rate on inbound/cold applications has dropped by roughly 70%. Meanwhile, referrals represent about 1% of total applications but account for 17-18% of all hires. A candidate with a referral is 9 times more likely to get hired than one applying cold.

Nine times.

Go read that again slowly.

I was playing a game where the entry path i was using, the front-door, "submit your application" path, was worth one-ninth of the path i didn't have access to. The path that required knowing someone. The path that required already being inside.

That wasn't a me problem. That was a structural fact about how the labor market works, dressed up as a meritocracy. And nobody told me, because the people who got hired through referrals had no reason to talk about it. To them, the system worked. They followed the advice, they got the job, the advice was good.

The only people who know the system is broken are the people it's broken for. And most of those people don't have platforms from which to tell anyone.


Here's where it connects to now.

I wrote recently that creation doesn't scale, iteration does. That great companies aren't created in a weekend, they're chiseled over years. That the filter isn't talent, it's whether you can stand the claustrophobic middle long enough for compounding to do its work.

The same exact argument applies to people.

You are not created in a moment. You are iterated into yourself. Day by day. Draft by draft. Most of them bad. None of them visible from the outside until much later. The compounding is ruthless and invisible and it is the only thing that actually produces a real person.

And here's the reframe that i think is finally possible in 2026:

The kids who had to author themselves are the ones least surprised right now.

Look at what's happening in tech as i write this. Entry-level tech hiring plummeted 73% in late 2025 compared to the year before. Employment for software developers aged 22-25 declined 20% between late 2022 and late 2025. The traditional "go to college, do internships, get a new-grad offer" path is in freefall.

But here's what almost nobody is saying out loud: the kids who never had access to that pipeline in the first place? The ones who were writing their own drafts from 16 onward? They were never dependent on it. They were already operating in a world with no playbook. They were already iterating.

I have two close friends who got hired at Arkero, founded by the ex-Remitly founder, as engineers. They're 21. They were hired not because of where they went to school (both good schools, but not Stanford / MIT), not because they had some magical referral, but because they could wield AI agents like native speakers. They had the iteration muscle from years of building things nobody asked them to build. And when the ground shifted under the industry, that muscle is what mattered.

Here's the thing about the 89% of companies now saying they prioritize juniors with "AI fluency": AI fluency isn't a credential. You can't get it by applying to 300 jobs. You get it by building things. By iterating. By writing your own first draft of a capability set nobody has taught you yet.

Which is exactly what first-gen kids have been doing forever.

The structural disadvantage that defined us for 40 years (no roadmap, no mentors, no pre-built path) just turned into the exact skill set the economy is most starved for.

That's not a coincidence. That's what happens when creationism breaks. When the pre-built paths stop leading anywhere, the kids who never had access to them are suddenly the only ones who know what to do.


Let me take it one level deeper because this is the part that actually moves me.

When i tell this story, people assume it was just me. The hustle narrative. The self-made 22-year-old. That framing is wrong in a specific way i want to correct.

I've written about my friend group before. Five kids. All from immigrant families. All did Running Start at Bellevue College together because it was pragmatic. The program paid off two years of college and guaranteed credit transfer to any WA state university. We made that decision at 16. None of us had a startup advisor or career counselor telling us to do it. We made it because our families needed the financial relief and the math was obvious if you were willing to look at it without ego.

Fast forward eight years. Paulo got into YC and raised $500k. Seth is doing quant. Jack did an elite language program in Tajikistan that takes ~12 people a year. Aliyah is finishing medical school and will be a doctor by 25. And i'm here building an AI company.

Completely different fields. Completely different specializations. One shared operating system: we authored ourselves because nobody was going to do it for us.

We didn't wait for discovery. We didn't wait for the path to reveal itself. We didn't wait for the referral or the mentor or the warm intro. We wrote bad first drafts of ourselves at 16, ripped them up, wrote again at 18, ripped those up, wrote again at 20, and at some point in the last year or two the drafts started to stabilize into people we actually wanted to become.

Five iterations. Five compounding curves. Five different fields. Same root cause: we were all first-gen kids who had to write our own first draft, and that forced muscle produced five different people who now all look like they "found their calling."

We didn't. We wrote it.

And my genuine, un-cynical belief after watching this play out in real time is that the self-authorship muscle is the defining muscle of this era. Not credentials. Not networks. Not internships. The ability to sit at a blank page and write a draft of yourself that nobody is going to validate, in a direction nobody has validated before.

That's the thing that used to be a curse for first-gen kids. Now it's the only skill that matters.


I think about my parents a lot when i write about this. I wrote before that they couldn't tell me what a startup was, but i don't think i said the deeper thing, which is that i wasn't resentful about it. I watched them write their own first drafts in a country that wasn't theirs. I watched my mom work harder than any American i've ever met to make a life in a language she had to learn. I watched my dad learn systems nobody had taught him in Tehran.

They were authors. They just authored in a different medium than i ended up authoring in. And the thing they gave me that nobody else could have, more than an SAT tutor or a Microsoft internship or a career advisor ever could, was a lived example of what it looks like to write yourself into existence in conditions that were not made for you.

That's the actual inheritance. Not the path. Not the connections. The demonstrated proof that a person can be authored from nothing, in a country that wasn't built with them in mind, and produce a life worth living at the end of it.

My parents didn't give me a path. They gave me a pen.

That's the better gift. It doesn't look like a gift when you're 16 and you're applying to 300 jobs and getting zero callbacks and you can't even name what you're trying to become. It just feels like being alone with a blank page.

But the blank page is the thing. Everyone eventually has to face it. Some people face it at 40 after a divorce or a layoff. Some face it at 50 after the kids leave. The first-gen kid faces it at 16 and starts writing, and by the time their peers face it, they've written 400,000 words and know their own voice.

The blank page makes you. It's the single most clarifying artifact in a human life. Most people spend decades avoiding it. The ones who got handed the blank page early are the ones who learned to write.


If you're reading this as one of those kids, i want to say something very directly:

You have not fallen behind.

The system you're losing in (the one where 300 applications go into a void, where referrals move 9x faster than merit, where "discover your path" is marketing copy for something you never had access to) that system is breaking in real time. It broke in 2025. It's going to keep breaking. And the thing that's replacing it is the thing you've been building without knowing it.

You've been writing. Drafts. Bad ones. Embarrassing ones. Cold emails nobody answered. Projects nobody asked for. Ideas you had at 2am that you wrote down and never showed anyone. Clubs you joined without being sure you belonged. Conversations you forced yourself into. Applications you sent into voids.

You weren't wasting your time. You were building the only muscle that will matter in the next 10 years. The muscle nobody handed to the kids who had pre-built paths. The muscle that lets you look at a blank page and write a draft.

The economy just caught up to the thing you've been doing since you were 16.

And if you're one of the kids on the Eastside with the Tesla driveway and the pre-built path, you're going to be fine too, but the adjustment you're about to have to make is the one the first-gen kids made a decade ago. The path is going to stop working. The advice is going to stop making sense. The career your parents mapped out for you is going to look less and less stable. And at some point you are going to have to pick up a pen and write your own first draft, which is a skill you've never practiced.

Start practicing now. It takes years.


I keep thinking about a friend who said to me recently: "You had a head start, you know. You're basically ten years ahead of me."

He was being generous. But i think what he really meant is: "You were forced to write earlier."

I was. That's it. That's the whole trick.

I ended the creation myth piece with a line from Armin Ronacher about roots going deeper than enthusiasm on any given day. I want to end this one with an extension of that idea:

Your enthusiasm will betray you. Your motivation will betray you. Your clarity about what you want to be will betray you, often.

The only thing that doesn't betray you is the writing.

The drafts. The bad ones. The ones you ripped up and tried again. The compound curve of years of showing up to a blank page and trying to put a person on it, before you knew who that person was supposed to be.

Nobody is coming to tell you what you are. Nobody was ever going to. That's not a tragedy. That's the only interesting part of the story.

Pick up the pen. Write a bad draft. Rip it up. Write another one.

The person you'll be in ten years is not waiting out there to be discovered. She is waiting in here to be written. You are the author. Nobody handed you this job, which means nobody can take it from you either.

God didn't make the world in 7 days. You're not going to make yourself in 7 years. You are never going to be finished. That's fine. That's the point.

Keep writing.

-parsa